U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 18 / 24

Section 18 — AH-18

AI-First Direction

Angi's declared strategic shift and the maturity pathway it implies.

Angi / HandyAH-18Page 18 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Executive Finding

Angi's Q1 2026 shareholder material describes a hard shift from incremental AI adoption to AI-first product development. It also describes a planned AI front desk for professionals that can make calls, receive calls and book appointments.

Evidenced today

  1. AI task interpretation
  2. AI professional matching
  3. AI customer communication
  4. AI appointment booking (announced)

Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review

  1. Future dynamic scheduling
  2. Future autonomous orchestration

Separation rule

  • The first three stages are supported by current public evidence.
  • AI appointment booking is announced rather than independently observed and should be tracked.
  • Dynamic scheduling and autonomous orchestration are forward-looking and must not be presented as observed functionality.

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Angi / Handy — AI-First Direction

PAGE 18 / 24 | AH-18

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.