U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 24 / 24

Section 24 — AH-24

Executive Conclusion — High-Priority Patent Review Target

Angi / Handy — consolidated technical conclusion on current public evidence.

Angi / HandyAH-24Page 24 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Executive Finding

Angi / Handy is a high-priority patent review target on the strength of AI-driven project interpretation, trade matching, region matching, schedule matching, professional selection and assignment, direct booking, appointment scheduling, Handy fulfilment and a declared AI-first strategic direction.

The most important unresolved issue is whether Angi's developing AI stack moves beyond understanding + matching + booking into duration + schedule construction + autonomous orchestration.

Priority reasons

  • AI-driven project interpretation
  • Trade matching
  • Region matching
  • Schedule matching
  • Professional selection / assignment
  • Direct booking
  • Appointment scheduling
  • Handy fulfilment
  • AI-first strategic direction

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Angi / Handy — Executive Conclusion

PAGE 24 / 24 | AH-24

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.