U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 17 / 24

Section 17 — TT-17

Provider Performance

Ratings, reviews and statistical provider data in both product and patent material.

ThumbtackTT-17Page 17 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Thumbtack Position — Public Evidence

Thumbtack's product and patent material includes customer reviews, ratings, fulfilment statistics, response behaviour and other provider statistical information. Its matching patent describes storing statistical data such as selection frequency, request fulfilment, response rates, reviews and ratings.

Patent ↔ Company Technical Mapping

Patent elementThumbtack — publicly observedStatus
Historical provider performance dataRatings, reviews and provider statisticsVery Strong Observed Correspondence
Performance influencing provider suitabilityStatistics used in matching / response selectionPatent-Disclosed Architecture Only
Performance influencing future schedulesNot publicly establishedNot Publicly Established

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Thumbtack — Provider Performance

PAGE 17 / 24 | TT-17

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.