U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 14 / 24

Section 14 — TR-14

Scheduling

The end-to-end construction of a confirmed appointment from provider availability and customer timing preference, and its transmission to the provider.

Executive Finding

The publicly described workflow — estimate, availability, bid, book, project — maps stage for stage onto the schedule-generation and transmission portion of the patent architecture.

Strong Technical AlignmentEvidence Confidence — Strongly Indicated
Alignment indicator89%
Technical alignment is an analytical assessment of publicly observable functionality and does not constitute a legal conclusion regarding infringement.

Observed Workflow

  1. Tasker Availability
  2. Customer Date / Time
  3. Appointment Window
  4. Bid
  5. Time Reservation
  6. Booking
  7. Confirmed Project

Patent Question

How does Taskrabbit's Estimate → Availability → Bid → Book sequence compare with the patent's construction of a task schedule?

Patent Architecture Sequence

  1. Provider Availability
  2. Task Duration
  3. Date / Time
  4. Task Schedule

Patent Position

United States Patent Application No. 19/476,586 — "DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS"

Claimed Patent Element

  • A task schedule is generated for the selected service provider and transmitted to that provider over the data communications network.

Specification / Embodiment Disclosure

  • The specification describes the schedule reconciling the assigned duration, the provider's availability and the service location.
  • Embodiments contemplate the schedule being updated and retransmitted as circumstances change.

Potential Future Patent Evolution

Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

  • Schedule construction across multiple engagements, automatic reconstruction on disruption and continuous re-optimisation.

Taskrabbit Position

  • Booking produces a confirmed appointment issued to both parties and surfaced as a managed project in the application.
  • Partner integration material describes the same sequence in machine-callable form: estimate, availability, bid, book, then project management.
  • The reserved window is removed from the provider's presented availability once confirmed.

Public Evidence

Each record below opens the full source entry — extract, publication and access dates, direct URL and archived URL where available — without leaving this analysis.

Technical Alignment

  • Schedule generation and transmission to the provider — the terminal stage of the architecture — is directly observable.
  • The bid and reservation stages evidence a time-reservation mechanism rather than a simple booking record.
  • The partner sequence shows the same pipeline reachable programmatically, which corresponds to the network-interface framing of the architecture.

Difference / Gap

  • The schedule is constructed for a single engagement chosen by the customer rather than composed by the system across a provider's day.
  • The architecture contemplates duration as an input to construction; here the window appears customer-selected.

Where Public Evidence Is Incomplete

  • Whether the reservation step applies buffers or travel allowances is not publicly documented.
  • The extent of partner-side automation in production integrations is not openly published.

Patent \u2194 Taskrabbit Mapping

Patent elementTaskrabbit positionStatus
Appointment schedulingPartner API Availability and Book endpointsStrong Observed Correspondence
Programmatic availability generationAvailability API returns real-time date/time windowsStrong Observed Correspondence
Booking of a selected windowBid creates a project agreement for the chosen window; Book completes the bookingStrong Observed Correspondence
Patent-equivalent task schedule constructionRequires further analysisPartial Correspondence
AI duration integrated into the scheduleNot established from public materialNot Publicly Established

Bid Detail

  • Taskrabbit's Bid API states that once a customer chooses a desired date/time window, a project agreement is created for that window.
  • Bid parameters include a target start time, described as the earliest time a Tasker can begin a project.

Book Detail

  • The Book endpoint completes the booking from the previously created project agreement.
  • Project status endpoints support post-booking management.

Patent Architecture Beyond Publicly Observed Functionality

The following matters are contemplated by the patent architecture and have not been established from Taskrabbit's public material. Absence of public evidence is not evidence that the functionality is absent from the company's internal technology stack.

  • Multi-engagement schedule composition and automatic retransmission on change are contemplated architecturally and are not publicly established.

Evidence Confidence

Strongly Indicated

The consumer booking outcome is directly observable and corroborated by help documentation; the partner-side stage sequence is described in integration material rather than in an openly published reference.

Strategic Interpretation

  • This is the stage where marketplace and scheduling architectures visibly converge, and it is well evidenced on both sides.
  • The partner workflow is the most direct public evidence that the pipeline is a system interface rather than only a consumer experience.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Scheduling

PAGE 14 / 24 | TR-14

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.