U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 06 / 24

Section 06 — TT-06

Location

Location is explicit in both Thumbtack's live marketplace and its own matching patent.

ThumbtackTT-06Page 06 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Thumbtack Position — Public Evidence

Thumbtack's matching patent expressly describes service requests containing a location and matches candidates against location and category. The platform operates local-professional matching nationwide.

Patent sequence

  1. Task location
  2. Provider region
  3. Provider subset

Thumbtack patent architecture

  1. Requested location
  2. Service category
  3. Candidate responders

Patent ↔ Company Technical Mapping

Patent elementThumbtack — publicly observedStatus
Task location as a filter inputLocation in the service request recordVery Strong Observed Correspondence
Provider geographic eligibilityCandidate responder determination by location and categoryVery Strong Observed Correspondence

Strategic Interpretation

This is a particularly important comparison because the correspondence is documented in Thumbtack's own patent language.

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Thumbtack — Location

PAGE 06 / 24 | TT-06

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.