U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 21 / 24

Section 21 — TT-21

Master Overlap Matrix — Thumbtack

The same rows applied to Taskrabbit and Angi / Handy, classified on Thumbtack public evidence.

ThumbtackTT-21Page 21 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Very Strong / Strong Evidence

  • Task Information
  • Location
  • Provider Expertise
  • Provider Qualification Information
  • Provider Category
  • Provider Capacity
  • Preferred Availability
  • Candidate Provider Generation
  • Machine-Learning Matching
  • Curated Provider Subset
  • Customer Selection
  • Ratings / Historical Provider Information
  • AI Task Interpretation

Partial / Product-Dependent

  • Booking
  • Schedule
  • Instant Book
  • Timing Intelligence

Not Publicly Established

  • AI Task-Duration Assignment
  • Multi-Task Provider Schedule Construction
  • Inter-Job Travel Optimisation
  • Dynamic Route Optimisation
  • Historical-Performance-Based Future Schedule Adjustment

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Thumbtack — Master Overlap

PAGE 21 / 24 | TT-21

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.