U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 13 / 24

Section 13 — AH-13

Task Duration

The critical differentiation question for Angi and Handy.

Angi / HandyAH-13Page 13 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Executive Finding

Angi clearly provides cost estimates, timeline guidance and AI-assisted project scoping. None of those is automatically equivalent to AI assignment of a recommended amount of time required to complete a specific task.

Investigate

  • Estimated job duration
  • Fixed service duration for pre-priced services
  • Predicted duration
  • AI duration
  • Professional-specific duration

Current classification

  • AI Recommended Task Duration — Not Yet Publicly Established.
  • Fixed-price service scope may imply an internal service length, but the mechanism is not exposed.

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Angi / Handy — Task Duration

PAGE 13 / 24 | AH-13

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.