U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 05 / 24

Section 05 — AH-05

Provider Skills & Trade

Mapping the patent's provider skill and experience data to Angi's trade and professional profile data.

Angi / HandyAH-05Page 05 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Patent Position

The patent stores provider skill, experience and capability information used to determine suitability for a given task.

Angi / Handy Position — Public Evidence

Angi publicly tells professionals that they can receive leads matching their trade, their schedule and their region, and allows professionals to present skills, ratings, reviews and service capability.

Patent ↔ Company Technical Mapping

Patent elementAngi / Handy — publicly observedStatus
Provider skill / experience dataTrade, skills and professional profileStrong Observed Correspondence
Capability-based suitability filterLeads matched to the professional's tradeStrong Observed Correspondence
Formal qualification / credential dataScreening and credential handling not fully exposed publiclyRequires Further Evidence

Investigate separately

Do not automatically combine credentials with skills.

  • Formal qualifications
  • Licences
  • Screening
  • Background checks
  • Trade credentials

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Angi / Handy — Provider Skills & Trade

PAGE 05 / 24 | AH-05

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.