U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 06 / 24

Section 06 — AH-06

Provider Location & Region

Geographic filtering of the eligible professional population.

Angi / HandyAH-06Page 06 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Angi / Handy Position — Public Evidence

Angi explicitly markets matching based on the professional's region, and its homeowner interface uses ZIP code as a primary request input.

Angi geographic sequence

  1. Homeowner location
  2. Service region
  3. Eligible professionals

Patent sequence

  1. Task location
  2. Provider geographic region
  3. Suitable provider population

Assessment

Geographic matching
Strong Observed Functional Correspondence

Technical Investigation Queue

  • How is a professional's service region stored — radius, ZIP list, polygon or metro?Evidence Required
  • Is region evaluated at lead generation, at ranking, or at both stages?Evidence Required
  • Does region interact with travel time in any way?Evidence Required

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Angi / Handy — Provider Location / Region

PAGE 06 / 24 | AH-06

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.