U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 11 / 24

Section 11 — AH-11

Handy Professional Matching

Who chooses the professional — the customer or the platform?

Angi / HandyAH-11Page 11 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Executive Finding

Handy describes itself as connecting customers with pre-screened independent service professionals and has described its platform as instantly matching large numbers of customers with highly rated professionals. For certain services the customer selects a service and a date and time rather than first choosing a named professional.

Taskrabbit pattern

  • Customer browses providers
  • Customer selects a named provider
  • Booking follows selection

Handy pattern (some workflows)

  • Customer selects service and time
  • Platform supplies the professional
  • Assignment is a platform decision

Investigate carefully

  • Which service categories are platform-assigned versus customer-selected?
  • Is assignment made at booking time or closer to the appointment?
  • What inputs drive the assignment decision?

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Angi / Handy — Handy Professional Matching

PAGE 11 / 24 | AH-11

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.