U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 08 / 24

Section 08 — TT-08

Matching Architecture — US 11,526,920 B2

A multi-stage funnel documented in Thumbtack's own granted patent.

ThumbtackTT-08Page 08 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Documented funnel

  1. Stage 1 — providers matching location and request type / category
  2. Stage 2 — compute variables including likelihood of customer selection and provider capacity
  3. Stage 3 — select a smaller group
  4. Stage 4 — generate and transmit responses

Patent ↔ Company Technical Mapping

Patent elementThumbtack — publicly observedStatus
Generation of a suitable provider populationStage 1 candidate determinationVery Strong Observed Correspondence
Reduction to a provider subsetStage 3 selection of a smaller groupVery Strong Observed Correspondence
Scoring against suitability variablesStage 2 variable computationPatent-Disclosed Architecture Only

Strategic Interpretation

This is highly relevant to the provider-subset aspect of the patent position review and may be the strongest single architectural correspondence in the three-company set.

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Thumbtack — Matching Architecture

PAGE 08 / 24 | TT-08

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.