U.S. Patent Position Review · 19/476,586

U.S. Patent Position Review — 19/476,586

DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING TASK SCHEDULES TO SERVICE PROVIDERS

Published international application: PCT/AU2024/050370 / WO2024216337A1

Return to IndexOverlap MatrixPAGE 24 / 24

Section 24 — TT-24

Executive Conclusion — High-Priority Technical Target

Thumbtack — consolidated technical conclusion on current public evidence.

ThumbtackTT-24Page 24 of 24Public-Evidence Technical Review

Executive Finding

Thumbtack should be treated as a high-priority technical target. Its own patents disclose sophisticated provider matching; location and request category are explicit inputs; provider capacity is explicit; machine-learning selection is disclosed; its current AI product uses expertise, project needs, ratings and preferred availability; and its business increasingly exposes the professional marketplace through AI systems.

The primary gap from public evidence remains the move from provider matching to provider schedule orchestration. That is where the patent comparison must concentrate.

Where the comparison concentrates

  1. From provider matching
  2. To provider schedule orchestration

Public Evidence

Each record exposes the source, publisher, date, direct link, relevant extract, what it establishes, what it does not establish and evidence confidence.

Classification language rule: "Not Publicly Established" records the limits of public evidence reviewed. It is not a finding that the company does not operate the technology. Forward-looking items are labelled: Potential Future Patent Development — Subject to Patent Attorney Review.

HJMT | U.S. Patent Position Review

Thumbtack — Executive Conclusion

PAGE 24 / 24 | TT-24

This portal provides a technical and commercial patent-positioning analysis based on publicly available information. It does not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, claim construction or freedom to operate. Legal conclusions should be determined by appropriately qualified patent counsel.